I REFER to Tang Leng Hong’s query about my healthcare column in the New Sunday Times (”Is this columnist qualified to give advice?” — NST, March 26).

As stated in the byline, I am a pharmacist with a doctorate in holistic medicine.

I am not a practitioner and do not see patients or give advice on health matters.

My articles are broad in nature and do not go into specifics. Indeed, not being a practitioner allows me to stay “light” and objective.

There is no element of “self-promotion”, “over-promotion of that particular specialty” or going “one-up” on other practitioners. I know many readers of the column appreciate this.

My training gives me an overview of the disciplines in the area of traditional medicine, of which Ayurveda is a major component.

I, nevertheless, do consult with experts on the field here and in India, specifically with scientists from the Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine in Jammu.

Several members there advise the Indian government on matters relating to Ayurveda.

Should there be inquiries or requests, I refer these to local practitioners who are registered with the Division of Traditional and Complementary Medicine of the Ministry of Health.

I was also an initial member of the standing committee in traditional medicine.

Needless to say, the NST edits my articles to make sure they are not confusing or misleading.

It is also important to appreciate that we live in a globalised world where people can easily access and clarify information stated in my column.

I am surprised by Tang’s assertion that “articles of such nature may cause readers to believe and apply the writer’s advice, which may be detrimental to their health”.

Should Tang need help or clarification, he can contact me at health@po.jaring.my

DATUK DR RAJEN M., Petaling Jaya

Source: NST – March 31, 2008