Current issues, feedback & complaints on public services in Malaysia
BUILDING owners and developers using the early streamer emission (ESE) lightning rods should note the latest ruling by the European Committee for Electro-technical Standardisation (Cenelec).
In February, Cenelec ruled that all member countries should withdraw any lightning protection standard that did not conform to the international standard (IEC-62305). Hence, the French ESE lightning protection standard (NFC 17-102) and all ESE lightning rods are now banned in Europe. This information was recently revealed by the International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), an international scientific organisation that focuses on lightning research and safety.
In fact, the ESE lightning rods have already been declared a danger to public safety in a warning issued in 2005 by the ICLP.
Locally, there has been awareness of the ESE problem since 2004 when a public forum was conducted by the Association of Consulting Engineers Malaysia (Acem) on the use of ESE and other non-conventional lightning rods.
When the ICLP issued the warning a year later, Acem was the only organisation to respond positively to it and issued an advisory to all its members not to use the ESE lightning rods. Unfortunately, the authorities and other engineering bodies ignored the problem and this led to the continued proliferation of the ESE lightning rods to this day.
Insurance companies that provide cover for buildings installed with ESE lightning rods should look carefully at the Cenelec ruling. This is because ESE lightning rods do not comply with the Sirim lightning protection standard (MS-IEC62305) either. Hence, they have been providing insurance cover to buildings that have been under-protected from lightning strikes and will suffer losses in the long run.
Many government buildings also use ESE lightning rods. Since these rods do not comply with Sirim standards, it is only proper that all government agencies set the right example by replacing them with lightning rods that fully comply with the Sirim standard.
It makes no sense to allow ESE lightning rods to be used on existing buildings or to install them on new building projects since they are already a known danger. This is an issue that should concern the Science, Technology and Innovation Ministry.
Z.A. HARTONO, Kuala Lumpur
Source: NST – June 17, 2009
TwoSen is updated daily with letters written to newspapers in Malaysia.
We publish all the letters here giving you a single source to keep track of current issues, feedback and complaints on public services. We do not alter the content of the letters, but do allow comments to facilitate positive discussions.
kasey
July 2nd, 2009 at 12:00 am
is there any response fr ESE rod manufacturer??
As i understand the french Std 17102 has been followed for years n test has shown ESE rods to be effective.