<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BUILDING SAFETY: Look again at lightning rod standards</title>
	<link>http://twosen.com/2009/06/17/building-safety-look-again-at-lightning-rod-standards/</link>
	<description>Current issues, feedback &#38; complaints on public services in Malaysia</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kasey</title>
		<link>http://twosen.com/2009/06/17/building-safety-look-again-at-lightning-rod-standards/#comment-7764</link>
		<dc:creator>kasey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://twosen.com/2009/06/17/building-safety-look-again-at-lightning-rod-standards/#comment-7764</guid>
		<description>is there any response fr ESE rod manufacturer??
As i understand the french Std 17102 has been followed for years n test has shown ESE rods to be effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there any response fr ESE rod manufacturer??<br />
As i understand the french Std 17102 has been followed for years n test has shown ESE rods to be effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

